<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>American Constitution Society - Missouri &#187; gender equality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.acsmissouri.org/category/gender-equality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.acsmissouri.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 18:58:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Ledbetter v. Goodyear Panel Thursday</title>
		<link>http://www.acsmissouri.org/2007/10/10/ledbetter-v-goodyear-panel-thursday/</link>
		<comments>http://www.acsmissouri.org/2007/10/10/ledbetter-v-goodyear-panel-thursday/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 04:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Frederick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[civil rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mizzou law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speakers and panels]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acsmissouri.org/2007/10/10/ledbetter-v-goodyear-panel-thursday/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thursday, Oct. 11, 1pm in Hulston Hall Rm. 6: The ACS-Missouri Supreme Court Series:  Ledbetter v. Goodyear and the Roberts Court Panelists:  Assistant Attorney General of the State of Missouri Heidi Vollet, and University of Missouri-Columbia School of Law Professors Christina Wells and Rigel Oliveri. Here, a video of Ledbetter describing her case before the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thursday, Oct. 11, 1pm in Hulston Hall Rm. 6:</p>
<p><strong>The ACS-Missouri Supreme Court Series:<br />
</strong><em> <a href="http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/06pdf/05-1074.pdf"><strong>Ledbetter v. Goodyear</strong></a></em><strong> and the Roberts Court</strong></p>
<p>Panelists:  Assistant Attorney General of the State of Missouri <strong>Heidi Vollet</strong>, and University of Missouri-Columbia School of Law Professors <a href="http://www.law.missouri.edu/faculty/wellsc.html">Christina Wells</a> and <a href="http://www.law.missouri.edu/faculty/oliverir.html">Rigel Oliveri</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jRpYoUu5XH0">Here</a>, a video of Ledbetter describing her case before the House Committee on Education and Labor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.acsmissouri.org/2007/10/10/ledbetter-v-goodyear-panel-thursday/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House Passes &quot;Lily Ledbetter Act&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.acsmissouri.org/2007/08/01/house-passes-lily-ledbetter-act/</link>
		<comments>http://www.acsmissouri.org/2007/08/01/house-passes-lily-ledbetter-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 02:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Frederick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyfidelic.com/wopr/2007/08/01/house-passes-lily-ledbetter-act/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WaPo: The Democrats&#8217; legislation would allow employees to sue within 180 days of their last affected paychecks. Senate Democrats are working on a similar bill. Ledbetter, who will not be helped by the legislation, said she hopes it helps other people. &#8220;I just want to open the doors for women in the future so they [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/31/AR2007073101085_pf.html"><i>WaPo</i></a>:<br />
<blockquote>The Democrats&#8217; legislation would allow employees to sue within 180 days of their last affected paychecks. Senate Democrats are working on a similar bill.</p>
<p>Ledbetter, who will not be helped by the legislation, said she hopes it helps other people. &#8220;I just want to open the doors for women in the future so they can be treated fairly,&#8221; she said in an interview.</p>
<p>The White House has threatened to veto the bill, and has enough votes in the House to make it stick.</p></blockquote>
<p>As <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Sweeney_%28labor_leader%29">John Sweeney</a> says in the article, this legislation wouldn&#8217;t even be necessary if the five justices in the majority hadn&#8217;t &#8220;bent over backwards, ignoring both precedent and common sense.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.acsmissouri.org/2007/08/01/house-passes-lily-ledbetter-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This is a Man&#8217;s Court</title>
		<link>http://www.acsmissouri.org/2007/05/29/this-is-a-mans-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.acsmissouri.org/2007/05/29/this-is-a-mans-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 19:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Frederick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[civil rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyfidelic.com/wopr/2007/05/29/this-is-a-mans-court/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scott Lemieux from LG&#38;M on the Supreme Court&#8217;s reversal of a Title VII discrimination award in Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire: The effect of Sandra Day O&#8217;Connor being replaced by Alito is particularly stark in this case. O&#8217;Connor&#8211;who was offered only secretarial jobs after graduating third from her Stanford Law class&#8211;had a good record on gender [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="/bimg/58292_SupremeCourt_justices.jpg"><img src="/bimg/58292_SupremeCourt_justices.jpg" style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer" border="0" /></a><br />
<a href="http://lefarkins.blogspot.com/2007/05/court-protects-gender-discrimintion.html">Scott Lemieux from LG&amp;M</a> on the Supreme Court&#8217;s reversal of a Title VII discrimination award in <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/05-1074.ZS.html"><em>Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire</em></a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>The effect of Sandra Day O&#8217;Connor being replaced by Alito is particularly stark in this case. O&#8217;Connor&#8211;who was offered only secretarial jobs after graduating third from her Stanford Law class&#8211;had a good record on gender discrimination, while Altio&#8217;s record on both gender issues and civil rights claims more broadly is atrocious. The useful idiots who claimed Alito was a moderate notwithstanding, his vote in this case was inevitable; I held out a shred of optimism that Thomas and Scalia might defer to the EEOC based on the former&#8217;s opinion in the Morgan case, but this was apparently hopeless optimism. Although these kinds of cases flay under the radar, this is a major way the Alito-fied Court will work to advance bad outcomes.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.acsmissouri.org/2007/05/29/this-is-a-mans-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
